Added: Chantale Tejeda - Date: 17.12.2021 06:08 - Views: 16191 - Clicks: 2670
In it, they emphasized that:. Married persons should understand that if in their marital relations they are guilty of unnatural, impure, or Oral sex lds practices, they should not enter the temple unless and until they repent and discontinue any such practices…The First Presidency has interpreted oral sex as constituting an unnaturalimpureor unholy practice.
In addition, Church Handbook 2 section In fact, the verbiage of the October letter to leaders and later temple recommend handbooks can be used to support an intpretation that leadership only meant to walk back the questioning and not necessarily disapprobation of oral sex. You should never deviate from or go beyond the specific questions contained in the temple recommend book. If in the course of such interviews a member asks questions about the propriety of specific conduct, you should not pursue the matter but should merely suggest that if the member has enough anxiety about the propriety of the conduct to ask about it, the best course would be to discontinue it.
The Limited Use Temple Recommend book was recently leaked.
This Temple Recommend handbook used similar verbiage as the October letter and continued to counsel leaders to advise against continuing any sexual practice a whose propriety a member asked specifically about and hence implicit disapprobation of oral sex. The verbiage used in these documents makes the current status unclear.
On the one hand, at least for nearly two decades since and perhaps for much longer depending on how long the Temple Recommend book was used the First Presidency or official Handbooks counseled leaders to advise against sexual conduct whose propriety was in question which is easy to interpret as oral sex or similar practices, especially given the letters. Induring an adult session of stake conference, a Stake Presidency north of Houston read parts of the January letter over the pulpit and then taught, based on the letter, that anyone having oral sex was not worthy to receive a temple recommend.
My brother relayed to me that after the Stake Presidency was corrected, Oral sex lds they spent the next several months pulling out all the adults from Sunday School class and reading to them the October letter. Such events seem unfortunate but not necessarily suprising given the ambigious status of oral sex and the manner in which the topic has been de-emphasized but not necessarily clarified. Members continue to report that local Church leadership perpetuate the teaching that oral sex is a sin.
All Mormon sex therapists of which I am aware either implicitly or explicitly Jennifer Finlayson-Fife and Natasha Helfer Parker approve of oral sex within marriage. On the one hand, you have the January First Presidency letter which has never been rescinded or modified. Thanks for reaching out with some questions. When it comes to working with clients around what they feel is or is not ok with certain sexual behaviors, we look at is it safe, sane and consensual? On a broad level I would say that is the thinking we operate under safe, sane and consensual.
And obviously work with the individual and the couple Oral sex lds have the difficult conversations and work through the discomfort that arises for a lot of couples as they navigate their sexual relationships. I think that sexuality is very complex, has a lot of layers, and hopefully continues to evolve over time and age. Growing up in conservative religions, as my LDS clients do, I think they hear and internalize a lot of messages of fear around sexuality and around having sex.
Listening to their church leaders about what is ok and what is not ok, what is good and what is bad. I see this hurt the sexual relationship for a lot of the clients I work with and find that as they step into the discomfort and wrestle with their issues around sex, they are able to own their own sexuality and have more meaningful and satisfying sexual relationships. On top of that, I have heard from a well respected professor at BYU that the Church actually wrote a follow up letter rescinding that original letter. In my opinion the LDS Church is very good at letting the members know what is and is not okay concerning sexuality.
Their stance on pornography or premarital sex is a great example of this. The education I have received has taught that the LDS Church wants the couple to determine what is sexually okay within the boundaries of their sexual relationship along with the direction of God. If the couple feels uneasy or unsure of a particular practice, they are counseled to talk to their bishop. Note: After receiving this communication, I sent this therapist links to the documents they referenced and my above analysis but received no reply back.
Oral sex, gospel hobbies, and the consequences of the lack of policy clarification. My brother was also in this same stake and reported Oral sex lds to me independent of the reddit comment cited. I was not privileged to know how the Stake Presidency was corrected. In it, they emphasized that: Married persons should understand that if in their marital relations they are guilty of unnatural, impure, or unholy practices, they should not enter the temple unless and until they repent and discontinue any such practices…The First Presidency has interpreted oral sex as constituting an unnaturalimpureor unholy practice.
The October letter instructs : You should never deviate from or go beyond the specific questions contained in the temple recommend book. Perpetuation Induring an adult session of stake conference, a Stake Presidency north of Houston read parts of the January letter over the pulpit and then taught, based on the letter, that anyone having oral sex was not worthy to receive a temple recommend.Oral sex lds
email: [email protected] - phone:(771) 298-2444 x 2979
The Daily Utah Chronicle